PHMAPALAD PG Soft Slots — Every Title & Its Published RTP
This section is made up of 4 pages on pg soft slots.
- PHMAPALAD Fortune Tiger
- Fortune Tiger, by PG Soft, is a slot laid out as a 3x3 grid and paying across 5 paylines.
- PHMAPALAD Lucky Neko
- Gigablox oversized symbol blocks appear on the 6x5 grid of Lucky Neko, a PG Soft slot.
- PHMAPALAD Mahjong Ways 2
- Mahjong Ways 2 comes from PG Soft, with a 5x4 grid that is evaluated as 2,000 ways to win.
- PHMAPALAD Wild Bounty Showdown
- Wild Bounty Showdown comes from PG Soft, with a 3-4-5-5-4-3 diamond grid evaluated as 3,000 ways to win.
A return-to-player figure is published by PG Soft for each title covered here, and where Pragmatic offers three, PG Soft appears to deliver just one fixed configuration per game. Where it falls short is displaying that figure to visitors: its own game pages render the field as a blank dash even though the number lives in the data the page is built from. There are 4 pages below.
Everything in this section
| Title | Published RTP | Max win | Ways to win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Bounty Showdown | 96.75% | 5000x | 3,000 ways to win |
| Fortune Tiger | 96.81% | 2500x | 5 |
| Lucky Neko | 96.73% | 100000x | giving as many as 32,400 ways to win, from 40 base paylines that become 85 in free spins |
| Mahjong Ways 2 | 96.95% | 100000x | a total of 2,000 ways to win, where the original had 1,024 |
4 pages, with every page dealing with one entry and none summarising several. A field above marked “not published” has an explanation on the entry’s own page, naming who would have had to publish it.
Each entry in a paragraph
You get a short summary of each, sufficient to pick the right page to open.
Wild Bounty Showdown explained
Released in 2022, this 6-reel ways-to-win slot gives 3,000 ways to win across 6 reels and rows of 3-4-5-5-4-3. Built around a diamond-shaped grid five symbols tall in the middle and three at the edges.
RTP published at 96.75%, maximum win 5000x, with the title described as high volatility.
Fortune Tiger in full
This 3x3 slot uses 3 reels and 3 rows, has 5 paylines, and came out in 2022. Built around close to the smallest a modern slot gets, with five lines on a 3x3 grid.
The published RTP is 96.81%, the maximum win 2500x, and the volatility is described as medium.
Lucky Neko, in detail
A 6-reel ways-to-win slot on 6 reels and 5 rows, giving as many as 32,400 ways to win, from 40 base paylines that become 85 in free spins, released 2021. Built around symbol blocks of oversized proportions, as large as 6x6, that fill the whole grid as a single symbol.
Described as medium volatility, this one has a published RTP of 96.73% and a maximum win of 100000x.
Mahjong Ways 2 explained
A 5-reel ways-to-win slot on 5 reels and 4 rows, a total of 2,000 ways to win, where the original had 1,024, released 2020. Built around a medium volatility label paired with a published maximum of 100,000x, an unusual combination.
Medium volatility is the label, backed by a published RTP of 96.95% and a 100000x maximum win.
The thing most often got wrong here
Use “per PG Soft’s published game data” for any figure here, never “as shown on PG Soft’s page”. Where the RTP should appear, the official page shows a dash for readers who check it.
Every figure checked out against independent consensus for the same title, which makes it genuine and strongly suggests the data is current rather than stale. Where a site asserts that the number shows on PG Soft’s page, any reader can disprove it with one click, and that is worse than having left it out.
See the pg soft slots details within the game itself
Because the visible page omits it, checking a PG Soft figure involves one more step than a Pragmatic one:
- On pgsoft.com, open the page belonging to the title. A dash in the RTP field is normal, and it is the reason these pages use “published game data” in place of “shown on the page”.
- Two independent aggregators give you something to compare the figure here with. This site counted agreement between the two as confirmation of real, current underlying data.
- Whether the grid shape fits the way-count is what to check. Several of these titles break the regular pattern, with Fortune Ox at 3-4-3 and Wild Bounty Showdown at 3-4-5-5-4-3, and calling them a flat “reels by rows” layout misrepresents the paytable.
- The maximum win of Treasures of Aztec is best seen as unsettled. Two numbers exist: 100,000x as a maximum exposure in PG Soft’s own data, and a practical maximum near 9,071x from independent simulation, which may well be measuring different things.
Playing pg soft slots at PHMAPALAD
- After signing in at PHMAPALAD, open the lobby for slots.
- Use the lobby’s search with a title from the table above, or filter by studio.
- The figures here should line up with the stake range and paytable on the game’s info screen, so open that screen and look.
- Settle your session budget, and keep stakes low until you have learned the feature round.
FAQ
Does PG Soft's site carry RTP?
Its server sends the figure in the data behind each game page, while the field you can see renders as a blank dash. It is studio-sourced, though it is not displayed on screen.
Like Pragmatic's titles, do PG Soft titles come in more than one RTP configuration?
For none of the titles here did any evidence of that emerge. Since each appears to ship with just one fixed figure, a PG Soft RTP that is quoted carries more direct meaning than one quoted for Pragmatic.
Are these titles available at PHMAPALAD?
Find the title you want by searching the Slots tab in the PHMAPALAD lobby. The figures hold wherever you play the game because each page here describes it just as its studio publishes it.
How are Mahjong Ways and Mahjong Ways 2 told apart?
Moving on, 1,024 ways become 2,000 (almost double), the cascade gives way to an avalanche, and the published maximum rises from 25,000x to 100,000x. From 96.92% to 96.95%, the RTP hardly changes; the added headroom is funded by how rarely it is hit.
Why was Treasures of Aztec's maximum win left empty?
The reason is that 100,000x is what PG Soft's own data field gives, yet independent simulation of the game's mathematics points to a practical maximum around 9,071x. A certified ceiling and a modelled outcome are not necessarily the same measure, and adopting one would misrepresent the other.
What should you make of a maximum win of 100,000x when the game is medium-volatility?
Typically that the top figure is only an accounting ceiling, not something realistic to expect. The medium volatility label speaks about where results gather; the 100,000x ceiling speaks about an event far from where they gather. There is no contradiction, as both are true together; the label is just the more useful one.